Semnele timpului -site feminist si anticrestin

Atentie!

Un site feminist toxic si anticrestin

E uluitor sa descoperi cat de mult au proliferat siteurile sistemului ce au ca unica marota degringolada statelor- națiuni prin emanciparea totala a femeii. Mai grav e cand se pretind si de expresie crestina! Subliminal sau pe fata, acest puroi mediatic extrem de toxic, expandeaza si contamineaza mintile oamenilor care le citesc.  Un asemenea exemplu de manipulare ordinara este Semnele timpului, ce se intituleaza pompos revista de analiza si opinie crestina, cand in realitate o trompeta de cea mai gregara pizdofilie pagana, care debiteaza cu astutie tot ceea ce Sistemul demonoratic si-a propus.

Situl oligofren Semnele timpului este edificator pentru tot ce poate reprezenta o societate bolnava, spalata pe creier, care traieste in prostitutie totala,  o aproba  si cu un tupeu de curve de bordel, se mai ia si de 7 nenorciti din Vaslui, care au gresit si ei odata, in timp ce curvetul imoral feminin, greseste de milioane de ori fara ca sa fie sanctionat de nimeni. Iata-l pe emulul care elucubreaza la Semnele timpului.

Cam ce-i preocupa pe acesti ipocriti ordinari, agenti ai iadului, sectanti ca Florentin Lehaci, ce se pretind, culmea tupeului de opinie crestina, desigur e vorba  de teme de pe agenda Sistemului:

http://semneletimpului.ro/tag/circumcizie

http://semneletimpului.ro/religie/biserica-ortodoxa/bo-romana/cand-vor-fi-impozitate-cultele-din-romania.html

http://semneletimpului.ro/religie/biserica-ortodoxa/bo-romana/bor-ar-putea-agrea-impozitarea-cu-o-conditie.html

http://semneletimpului.ro/religie/ce-va-spune-papa-francisc-in-fata-congresului-american.html

http://semneletimpului.ro/religie/etica-si-morala/fertilizare-in-vitro/in-cautarea-copilului-perfect.html

http://semneletimpului.ro/social/minoritati/sondaj-teama-de-evrei-o-constanta-pentru-unii-romani.html

http://semneletimpului.ro/social/violul-din-vaslui-vinovatii-convertiti-in-eroi.html

Sluga penibila Boc Troc

Staffu din umbra care diriguieste Clujul, in frunte cu Paskany Arpad, care îi da ordine la pitacania Boc, s-a pus puternic pe treaba. Cum alta slauga mai buna ca Boc nu exista, Paskany si -a pus tunurile de presa sa inceapa campania pentru nentu preferat. Pentru aceasta si-a moblizat armata de propagandisti, Sabin Gherman, Liviu Alexa, trustul LOOK TV, Stiri de Cluj, Ziar de Cluj, Gazeta de Cluj, CityNews si restul. Iata pseudosondajul:

Sondaj de opinie marca Paskany Arpad:

Cine ar trebui să fie candidatul PNL Cluj la Primărie?

4269 voturi

Emil Boc

 

4459 voturi

Mihai Seplecan

 

138 voturi

Daniel Buda

 

585 voturi

Alin Tise

 

439 voturi

Radu Moisin

Caraghiosii presei pascaniote au adoptat aceeiasi tactica ca in 2012, adica au publicat un sondaj scos din burta in care, chipurile, Boc e pe locul 2 in ordinea preferintelor de la PNL, dupa un no name, Szeplecan.  La fel au facut si in 2012 cand inainte de alegeri îl dadeau pe Nicoara pe primul loc si boc era pe doi, ca in final, piticania penticostala, cu sacii de voturi de adunați de prin oras, anume rataciți si plasați de taximetristi cui trebuia, primiti moca, sa castige, prin furaciune desigur. Pe strategia aceasta mizeaza si la alegerile de anul viitor si pe prostia clujenilor aburiti cu boc. Pentru a obtine inca un mandat impostorul boc e in stare de orice- sa iasa sa dirijeze circulatia, sa pupe babe, sa de-a cu coasa, sa apara la toate concertele din Cluj, sa faca tumbe, etc. Boc e expert in comicarii penibile.

Ratiunea pentru care Boc e plasat mereu pe locul doi, si nu mai jos, este una singura: sa-i stimuleze pe gibonii bocisti sa iasa la vot si sa nu se culce pe o ureche ca, vezi doamne, boc, oricum triumfă. Ca si in 2012 si dintotdeauna,

Boc e favoritul ungurilor si a celor de la UDMR, care stiu ca boc le satisface toate dorintele chiar in detrimentul romanilor, nu intamplator, atat de defaimati pe argintii lui Paskany, de mercenarul Gherman Sabin la LooK tv. E o inteaga masinarie propagandistica turata sa spele mintile romanilor din Cluj si din Ardeal, uniti in aceiasi cauza fiind si Rares Bogdan, Hoandra Octavian si alti lingai, care mimeaza ca mor de dragul romanilor, cand, de fapt, ei isi bat joc de cauza romaneasca.  Ce urmeaza? Boc cu coasa, boc oficiind nunti, boc in costum popular, si alte atatea si atatea ticalosii pe care acest pitic soios, tras cu cheita, este in stare sa le faca dincolo de orice penibil.

Deci daca nu v-a ajuns mai dati un mandat lui Paskany Boc. Vor fi fentati clujenii si a 4-a oara?

Cât de puternic e `Arpi`? Are influenţă la DNA şi la Băsescu?

Cât de puternic e `Arpi`? Are influenţă la DNA şi la Băsescu?

http://www.prosport.ro/fotbal-intern/liga-1/cat-de-puternic-e-arpi-are-influenta-la-dna-si-la-basescu-3870896

 

Postul Castrarea 3 isi pierde audienta !

Violul a ucis audienta Antenei 3

Postul Castrarea 3 sau Latrina 3 pierde masiv la capitolul audienta. Dupa ce s-au dat de ceasul mortii ca sa-i bage in puscarie pe cei 7 amarati din Vaslui, vor constata ca prea mult viol nu face bine la digestia telespectatorilor. Violul in sus, violul in jos, 24 de ore de agresiune pizdista revansarda produce voma telespectatorilor. Ce-i mult strica!

FII…(PE FAZA) – MIHAELA BARZILA

Mihaela Castrare Barzila, Maria Coman, et co. au dus Antena 3 in bot. Chiar daca n-a asistat la viol ea stie tot si arunca flacari pe nari, mintind de rupe locul. Sa vedem daca-si va asuma prima sunucidere, pe care a indus-o, ce urmeaza sa se produca in lotul celor 7, orcicum daca nu ea, urmasii. Ce mai conteaza barzila o face lata.

ALERTA IN PENITENCIARUL din Vaslui. Unul dintre agresori, dus de urgenta la SPITAL

http://www.romaniatv.net/romania-tv-lider-absolut-la-stiri_240512.html

Miza circului mediatic Antena 3: castrarea!

Intr-o emisiune de sambata seara, Mihaela Barzila a umblat iar cu castrarea in gura si aproape ca si-a lasat muti invitatii barbati care nu prea au rumegat ideea ca barbatilor infractori sa le fie extirpate bucati din barbatie.

Emisiunea a fost o manipulare de cea mai joasa speta reiterandu-se ideea ca Germania castreaza chirurgical violatorii. Total fals evident!!! Totul a plecat de fapt de la un articol publicat de unul din oficioasele politicii evreo-masonice care avanseaza ideea, desigur din cu totul alte ratiuni, nicidecum de grija romanilor, ci dimpotriva pentru rarirea lor, inducerea conflictelor, distragarea atentiei de la probleme cu adevarat grave, etc etc etc.

Desigur pentru vulg e mai greu de priceput. Articolul cu pricina cita un alt articol la fel de mincinos, scos din burta, de Daily mail. De ce ce minte Antena 3? De ce dezinformeaza? Jocurile caror forte le face? Pentru banditele de la Antena 3 trebuie spus clar: nicaieri in lume NU se practica nici un fel de castrare, decat daca dilcventul isi doreste asa ceva si numai cu consimtamantul obligatoriu scris al lui. Altfel nimeni nu isi asuma responsabilitatea mutilarii unor barbati.

De ce dezinformati totusi? Pe cine credeti ca mintiti nenorocitilor cu televiziunea lui Voiculescu cu tot si pana cand veti face politica criminala a altora cu minti bolnave? Nu vedeti unde v-a ajuns patronul daca faceti rele neamului romanesc? Vreti si voi sa-i calcati pe urme?

Deci sa va intre bine in cap: instantele  nu pot dispune pedepse corporale indiferent cat de grava ar fi o infractiune decat cel mult un program terapeutic, monitorizari, nicidecum castrarea din capul vostru de obsedate sexuale si… 

Pentru a vedea adevarul in deplinatatea lui mergem direct la CODUL PENAL GERMAN care sub aspectul pedepselor este mult mai bland decat actuala legislatie penala romaneasca.

Reproducem exact articolele in engleza:

GERMAN CRIMINAL CODE

Full:  Criminal Code in the version promulgated on 13 November 1998, Federal Law Gazette [Bundesgesetzblatt] I p. 3322, last amended by Article 1 of the Law of 24 September 2013, Federal Law Gazette I p. 3671 and with the text of Article 6(18) of the Law of 10 October 2013, Federal Law Gazette I p 3799.

 

Section 177  Violul
Sexual assault by use of force or threats; rape

(1) Whosoever coerces another person

1.  by force;

2.  by threat of imminent danger to life or limb; or

3.  by exploiting a situation in which the victim is unprotected and at the mercy of the offender,

to suffer sexual acts by the offender or a third person on their own person or to engage actively in sexual activity with the offender or a third person, shall be liable to imprisonment of not less than one year.

(2) In especially serious cases the penalty shall be imprisonment of not less than two years. An especially serious case typically occurs if

1.  the offender performs sexual intercourse with the victim or performs similar sexual acts with the victim, or allows them to be performed on himself by the victim, especially if they degrade the victim or if they entail penetration of the body (rape); or

2.  the offence is committed jointly by more than one person.

(3) The penalty shall be imprisonment of not less than three years if the offender

1.  carries a weapon or another dangerous instrument;

2.  otherwise carries an instrument or other means for the purpose of preventing or overcoming the resistance of another person through force or threat of force; or

3.  by the offence places the victim in danger of serious injury.

(4) The penalty shall be imprisonment of not less than five years if

1.  the offender uses a weapon or another dangerous instrument during the commission of the offence; or if

2.  the offender

(a)  seriously physically abuses the victim during the offence; or

(b)  by the offence places the victim in danger of death.

(5) In less serious cases under subsection (1) above the penalty shall be imprisonment from six months to five years, in less serious cases under subsections (3) and (4) above imprisonment from one to ten years.

Section 178
Sexual assault by use of force or threat of force and rape causing death

If the offender through sexual assault or rape (section 177) causes the death of the victim at least by gross negligence the penalty shall be imprisonment for life or not less than ten years.

table of contents

Section 179
Abuse of persons who are incapable of resistance

(1) Whosoever abuses another person who is incapable of resistance

1.  because of a mental illness or disability including an addiction or because of a profound consciousness disorder; or

2.  is physically incapable,

and by exploiting the incapability to resist engages in sexual activity with the person or allows them actively to engage in sexual activity on his person shall be liable to imprisonment from six months to ten years.

(2) Whosoever abuses a person incapable of resistance (subsection (1) above), by inducing the person, under exploitation of the incapability of resistance, to engage actively in sexual activity with a third person or to allow a third person to engage in sexual activity with them, shall incur the same penalty.

(3) In especially serious cases the penalty shall be imprisonment of not less than one year.

(4) The attempt shall be punishable.

(5) The penalty shall be imprisonment of not less than two years if

1.  the offender performs sexual intercourse or similar sexual acts with the victim which include penetration of the body, or allows them to be committed on himself by the victim;

2.  the offence is committed jointly by more than one person; or

3.  by the offence the offender places the victim in danger of serious injury or substantial impairment of his physical or emotional development.

(6) In less serious cases under subsection (5) above the penalty shall be imprisonment from one to ten years.

(7) Section 177(4) No 2 and section 178 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

table of contents

Section 180
Causing minors to engage in sexual activity

(1) Whosoever encourages a person under sixteen years of age to engage in sexual activity with or in the presence of a third person or whosoever encourages sexual acts of a third person on a person under sixteen years of age

1.  by acting as an intermediary; or

2.  by creating an opportunity,

shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years or a fine. The 1st sentence No 2 above shall not apply if the offender is the person responsible for the care of the minor unless the offender, if responsible for the care of the minor, grossly violates his duty of education.

(2) Whosoever induces a person under eighteen years of age to engage in sexual activity with or in the presence of a third person or to suffer sexual acts by a third person for a financial reward, or whosoever encourages such acts by acting as an intermediary, shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years or a fine.

(3) Whosoever induces a person under eighteen years of age who is entrusted to him for upbringing, education or care or who is his subordinate within an employment or a work relationship, by abusing the dependence associated with the upbringing, educational, care, employment or work relationship to engage in sexual activity with or in the presence of a third person or to suffer sexual acts by a third person shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years or a fine.

(4) In cases under subsections (2) and (3) above the attempt shall be punishable.

table of contents

Section 180a
Exploitation of prostitutes

(1) Whosoever on a commercial basis maintains or manages an operation in which persons engage in prostitution and in which they are held in personal or financial dependency shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years or a fine.

(2) Whosoever

1.  provides a dwelling or on a commercial basis an abode or a residence to a person under eighteen years of age for the exercise of prostitution; or

2.  urges another person to whom he has furnished a dwelling for the exercise of prostitution to engage in prostitution or exploits the person in that respect,

shall incur the same penalty.

table of contents

Section 180b and section 181
(repealed)

table of contents

Section 181a
Controlling prostitution

(1) Whosoever

1.  exploits another person who engages in prostitution; or

2.  for his own material benefit supervises another person’s engagement in prostitution, determines the place, time, extent or other circumstances of the engagement in prostitution, or takes measures to prevent the person from giving up prostitution, and for that purpose maintains a general relationship with the person beyond a particular occasion shall be liable to imprisonment from six months to five years.

(2) Whosoever impairs another person’s personal or financial independence by promoting that person’s engagement in prostitution, by procuring sexual relations on a commercial basis, and for that purpose maintains a general relationship with the person beyond a particular occasion shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years or a fine.

(3) Whosoever commits the offences under subsection (1) Nos 1 and 2 above or the promotion under subsection (2) above in relation to his spouse shall incur the penalty under subsections (1) and (2) above.

table of contents

Section 181b
Supervision order

In cases under sections 174 to 174c, sections 176 to 180, section 181a and section 182 the court may make a supervision order (section 68(1)).

table of contents

Section 181c
Confiscatory expropriation and extended confiscation

Section 43a and section 73d shall apply to offences under section 181a(1) no. 2 if the offender acts as a member of a gang whose purpose is the continued commission of such offences. Section 73d shall also apply if the offender acted on a commercial basis.

table of contents

Section 182
Abuse of juveniles

(1) Whosoever abuses a person under eighteen years of age by taking advantage of an exploitative situation by

1.  engaging in sexual activity with the person or suffering the person to engage actively in sexual activity with him or

2.  inducing the person to engage in sexual activity with a third person or to suffer sexual acts committed on their own body by a third person,

shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years.

(2) The same penalty shall apply to a person over eighteen years of age who abuses a person under eighteen years of age by engaging in sexual activity with him or to by inducing the person to suffer sexual acts committed by him on their own body for a financial reward.

(3) A person over twenty-one years of age who abuses a person under sixteen years of age by

1.  engaging in sexual activity with the person or causing the person to engage actively in sexual activity with him or

2.  inducing the person to engage in sexual activity with a third person or to suffer sexual acts committed on their own body by a third person,

and thereby exploits the victims lack of capacity for sexual self-determination shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years or a fine.

(4) The attempt shall be punishable.

(5) In cases under subsection (3) above the offence may only be prosecuted upon request unless the prosecuting authority considers propio motu that prosecution is required out of special public interest.

(6) In cases under subsections (1) to (3) above the court may order a discharge under these provisions if in consideration of the conduct of the person against whom the offence was committed the harm of the offence is of a minor nature.

table of contents

Section 183
Exhibitionism

(1) A man who annoys another person by an exhibitionist act shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine.

(2) The offence shall only be prosecuted upon request unless the prosecuting authority considers propio motu that prosecution is required out of special public interest.

(3) The court may suspend the sentence if there is reason to believe that the offender will only cease to commit exhibitionist acts after lengthy medical treatment.

(4) Subsection (3) above shall also apply if a man or a woman is convicted because of an exhibitionist act

1.  under another provision which imposes a maximum term of imprisonment of no more than one year; or

2.  under section 174 (2) No 1 or section 176 (4) No 1

table of contents

Section 183a
Causing a public disturbance

Whosoever in public engages in sexual activity and thereby intentionally or knowingly creates a disturbance shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine unless the act is punishable under section 183.

table of contents

Section 184
Distribution of pornography

(1) Whosoever with regard to pornographic written materials (section 11(3))

1.  offers, gives or makes them accessible to a person under eighteen years of age;

2.  displays, presents or otherwise makes them accessible at a place accessible to persons under eighteen years of age, or which can be viewed by them;

3.  offers or gives them to another in retail trade outside the business premises, in kiosks or other sales areas which the customer usually does not enter, through a mail-order business or in commercial lending libraries or reading circles;

3a.  offers or gives them to another by means of commercial rental or comparable commercial supply for use, except for shops which are not accessible to persons under eighteen years of age and which cannot be viewed by them;

4.  undertakes to import them by means of a mail-order business;

5.  publicly offers, announces, or commends them at a place accessible to persons under eighteen years of age or which can be viewed by them, or through dissemination of written materials outside business transactions through the usual trade outlets;

6.  allows another to obtain them without having been requested to do so;

7.  shows them at a public film showing for an entry fee intended entirely or predominantly for this showing;

8.  produces, obtains, supplies, stocks, or undertakes to import them in order to use them or copies made from them within the meaning of Nos 1 to 7 above or to facilitate such use by another; or

9.  undertakes to export them in order to disseminate them or copies made from them abroad in violation of foreign penal provisions or to make them publicly accessible or to facilitate such use,

shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine.

(2) Subsection (1) No 1 above shall not apply if the offender is the person in charge of the care of the person, unless that person grossly violates his duty of education by offering, giving, or making them available. Subsection (1) No 3a above shall not apply if the act takes place in business transactions with commercial borrowers.

table of contents

Section 184a
Distribution of pornography depicting violence or sodomy

Whosoever

1.  disseminates;

2.  publicly displays, presents, or otherwise makes accessible; or

3.  produces, obtains, supplies, stocks, offers, announces, commends, or undertakes to import or export, in order to use them or copies made from them within the meaning of Nos 1 or 2 above or facilitates such use by another, pornographic written materials (section 11(3)) that have as their object acts of violence or sexual acts of persons with animals

shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years or a fine.

table of contents

Section 184b
Distribution, acquisition and possession of child pornography

(1) Whosoever

1.  disseminates;

2.  publicly displays, presents, or otherwise makes accessible; or

3.  produces, obtains, supplies, stocks, offers, announces, commends, or undertakes to import or export in order to use them or copies made from them within the meaning of Nos 1 or 2 above or facilitates such use by another pornographic written materials (section 11 (3)) related to sexual activities performed by, on or in the presence of children (section 176 (1)) (child pornography)

shall be liable to imprisonment from three months to five years.

(2) Whosoever undertakes to obtain possession for another of child pornography reproducing an actual or realistic activity shall incur the same penalty.

(3) In cases under subsection (1) or subsection (2) above the penalty shall be imprisonment of six months to ten years if the offender acts on a commercial basis or as a member of a gang whose purpose is the continued commission of such offences and the child pornography reproduces an actual or realistic activity.

(4) Whosoever undertakes to obtain possession of child pornography reproducing an actual or realistic activity shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding two years or a fine. Whosoever possesses the written materials set forth in the 1st sentence shall incur the same penalty.

(5) Subsections (2) and (4) above shall not apply to acts that exclusively serve the fulfilment of lawful official or professional duties.

(6) In cases under subsection (3) above section 73d shall apply. Objects to which an offence under subsection (2) or (4) above relates shall be subject to a depriation order. Section 74a shall apply.

table of contents

Section 184c
Distribution, acquisition and possession of juvenile pornography

(1) Whosoever

1.  disseminates;

2.  publicly displays, presents, or otherwise makes accessible; or

3.  produces, obtains, supplies, stocks, offers, announces, commends, or undertakes to import or export in order to use them or copies made from them within the meaning of Nos 1 or 2 above or facilitates such use by another pornographic written materials (section 11 (3)) related to sexual activities performed by, on or in the presence of persons between the ages of fourteen to eighteen years (juvenile pornography)

shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years or a fine.

(2) Whosoever undertakes to obtain possession for another of juvernile pornography reproducing an actual or realistic activity shall incur the same penalty.

(3) In cases under subsection (1) or subsection (2) above the penalty shall be imprisonment of three months to five years if the offender acts on a commercial basis or as a member of a gang whose purpose is the continued commission of such offences and the juvenile pornography reproduces an actual or realistic activity.

(4) Whosoever undertakes to obtain possession of child pornography reproducing an actual or realistic activity shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine. The 1st sentence shall not apply to acts of persons related to juvenile pornography produced by them while under eighteen years of age and with the consent of the persons therein depicted.

(5) Section 184b (5) and (6) shall apply mutatis mutandis.

table of contents

Section 184d
Distribution of pornographic performances by broadcasting, media services or telecommunications services

Whosoever disseminates pornographic performances via broadcast, media services, or telecommunications services shall be liable pursuant to sections 184 to 184c. In cases under section 184 (1) the 1st sentence above shall not apply to dissemination via media services or telecommunications services if it is ensured by technical or other measures that the pornographic performance is not accessible to persons under eighteen years of age.

table of contents

Section 184e
Unlawful prostitution

Whosoever persistently contravenes a prohibition enacted by ordinance against engaging in prostitution in particular places at all or during particular times of the day, shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding one hundred and eighty daily units.

table of contents

Section 184f
Prostitution likely to corrupt juveniles

Whosoever engages in prostitution

1.  in the vicinity of a school or other locality which is intended to be visited by persons under eighteen years of age; or

2.  in a house in which persons under eighteen years of age live,

in a way which is likely to morally corrupt these persons, shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine.

table of contents

Section 184g
Definitions

Within the meaning of this law

1.  sexual acts and activities shall only be those which are of some relevance in relation to the protected legal interest in question;

2.  sexual acts and activities in the presence of another shall be those which are committed in the presence of another who observes them.

table of contents

 

Presiunea mediatica uriasa si vicierea proceselor in instanta

Cazul celor 7 tineri de la Vaslui a scos la iveala dimensiunea reala a  uriaselor presiuni mediatice care au culminat cu instigari publice la ura si discriminare, in masura sa atraga raspunderea penala a initiatorilor acestor actiuni in calitatea lor de realizatori si coordonatori de emisiuni tv, jurnalisti de presa scrisa etc. care au produs a stare de puternica tulburare sociala in localitatile de domiciliu a inculpatilor sfidand localnicii si toate cutumele locale, cu inentia vadita de intimidare a participantilor la procesul penal, cu deosebire pentru a induce o stare de panica inculpatilor. Au relatat trunchiat opiniile localnicilor tocmai pentru a fi denigrati de opinia publica, determinand  atribuirea in masa de apelative incriminatoare la adresa tutoror locuitorilor comunei Valeni si a judetului Vaslui in general.

Din pacate desi sesizat punctual CNA -ul nu a luat masurile necesare in asemenea situatii desi li s-a cerut  aplicarea sanctiunilor legale pentru posturile tv care au incalcat flagrant normele de conduita ale audio-vizualului, tocmai pentru a nu compromite desfasurarea procesului penal.

CNA -ul  a preferat sa raspunda ca deobicei evaziv, fara a dispune asa cum s-a cerut suspendarea pentru un interval de timp a emisiunilor posturilor tv indicate si pana in momentul de fata nu au fost aplicate nici amenzile care conform legii trebuia aplicate imperativ. 

Presiunile pe care televiziunile le-au exercitat  asupra procesului penal au facut ca  doar hazardul si vigilenta organelor de ordine sa impiedice linsarea fizica  a cel putin  3 dintre cei acuzati de viol.

Din cauza acestor ingerinte media, care exced la modul penal limitele deontologice ale jurnalismului de informare impartial, procesul celor 7 este viciat si toate actele procesuale ar trebui refacute integral, nemaivorbind de necesitatea efectuarii la modul cel mai riguros cu putinta a cercetarii la fata locului si  reconstituirea, etc care nu au fost efectuate in cursul urmaririi penale.

De asemenea trebuie administrate  sau readministrate toate probele in virtutea principiilor care caluzesc procesul penal. Practic haituiti de televiziuni, celor 7 tineri le-au fost incalcate de catre instanta orice drepturi la aparare. Asa cum s-a derulat pana acum,  procesul a fost o executie publica, un simulacru care nu o tinut o secunda cont de prezumtia de nevinovatie. Am revuzut inregistrarile prilejuite de relatarea faimoaselor televiziuni americane a diferitelor cazuri de crima si am remarcat cu cata atentie respectau  audiatur et altera pars. Toate relatarile puneau in balanta aproape farmaceutica argumentele pro si contra,  timpi egali de expunere, nici vorba sa se situeze fatis, deliberat de o anumita parte din proces. Nici vorba de circul mediatic abject pe care il practica mass media romaneasca. Vocea acuzatorilor se auzea in pondere egala cu cea a acuzatilor, impartialitatea presei americane fiind de notorietate. Jurnalistii aveau obiectivitate totala in relatari, nici vorba sa fie influentate de false procese de constiinta, revelatii, speculatii, insinuari. Concluziile erau trase debia din momentul verdictului justitiei. Nu tzatzisme, nu infatuari, nu dat cu presupusu aiurea, nu antepronuntari, etc.

In urma celor intamplate avocatii celor 7 vor trebui sa sesizeze toate organsimele interne dar mai ales cele internationale care se ocupa cu respectarea drepturilor omului pentru a face cunoscuta intruziunea mediatica asupra bunului mers al unui proces penal, cu toate incalcarile grave ale drepturilor inculpatilor.

Pe scurt procesul va trebui rejudecat in eventualitatea in care apararea va gasi de cuviinta sa lupte pentru corectitudinea solutionarii cauzei.  Pana atunci, trebuie recurs la toate remediiile procesuale, deoarece in actualele conditii instantei nu-i revine decat rolul de a confirma sentintele date deja de mass-media, asa dupa cum lesne s-a observat. Ori asa ceva e inadmisibil.

https://forumwebtop.wordpress.com/2015/09/05/ura-fata-de-barbatul-alb/

Un personaj gaunos: Dan Antonescu

Un rebut al societatii-

papagal al sistemului

Pe ecran tot apare un nene de vreo 58 de ani in niste spoturi caraghioase din cale afara, in care, pe bani publici, cica, vrea sa atraga atentia publicului larg, cum sa se fereasca de suti, pungasi ori hoti de-a binelea.

Am aflat ca il cheama Dan Antonescu si ca ar fi fost repartizat de comunisti, dupa absolvirea scolii de ofiteri la  militia capitalei, sectorul 1, la „economic” de unde l-au aruncat la „omoruri” iar apoi i-au tot dat suturi in cur pana l-au scos din politie. Ramas pe drumuri, omu’ si-a incercat „talentele” in tembeliziune si dupa niste reportaje rasuflate rau la realitatea tv a ajuns la clipuri de preventie, de tot rahatu.

Omu’ e de un caraghios fara margini, se precipita ca o muiere isterica. Marele pacat e ca nu-si da seama cat de penibil e,.. dar prostu nu-i prost destul daca nu-i si fudul.  L-am urmarit in mai multe interventii si mi-am dat seama ca sufera de retard mintal si are un proptotip de cognitie de tip feminin. Cum dracu a putut fi, un minut, anchetator un asemenea specimen, care judeca totul foarte patimas, ceea ce nu are dreptul niciodata s-o faca un profesionist. Indiferent de subiect, epateaza in limbajul de presa de doi bani, folosind stilul bombastic si nonargumentativ al stirilor facute dupa ureche si la plesneala. Un asemenea mediocru nu e de mirare ca a fost zburat din politie. Mai nou individul se pretinde expert criminalist, evident habar neavand de criminalistica. Criminalistii niciodata nu-si dau cu parea asupra cuantumului unor pedepse ca precupetele la piata, nu invoca aiuristic circumstante agravante, cum face acest Dan Antonescu. Criminalistu lu’ peste prajit intra in direct la tv, mereu nedocumentat, compara mere cu pere, recte  pedepsele din sistemul anglo-saxon cu cele din sistemul de drept romanic, gafeaza in lant,  nu distinge  raportul de cauzalitate, etc etc. Dar guristu agiamiu se opinteste sa se de-a mereu important, mereu sfatos, mereu interesant si chiar crede ca-i iese. Jalnic! Se poate lua de mana cu un alt psiho- criminalist, de snoave ieftine, Tudorel Butoi.   

 

BOC si Horthy Miklos

Primarul Emil Boc, sponsor pentru promovarea unui terorist şi a unui fascist

De la BUGET 70.000 de euro cadou de la Boc pentru unguri revizionisti !!!

Imbecilul de penticostal Boc nu a rezistat sa nu-i serveasca financiar generos pe bunii lui prieteni unguri revizionisti. Ce mai conteaza ca le da din bani  nostrii  publici ca sa-i celebreze pe nazisti,pe Horthy si alti criminali de razboi unguri, dupa ce tot acest impostor Boc, le-a retrocedat moca tot centrul istoric al urbei de pe Somes. Si mai ales acum cand Paszkany il pregateste pe zanoaga din Rachitele pentru un nou mandat de primar din 2016, adica sa fie sluga in continuare la sefu lui din umbra si la unguri. Si prostii de romani il voteaza.

Uitati-va atent in poza sa vedeti cum piticu boc se face curca sub privirile mafiotice ale lui paskany. Va dati seama cine e seful lui Boc,  nimeni altul decat paskany, omu lui soros, si realizati cam cum se pituleaza boc fata de nababul care-l face mereu primar. Clujul e pe mainile lor la discretie de peste 10 ani. Toate televiziunile LooK tv ale lui paskany il servesc pe boc la catarama… lata. Dupa ce se vede primar se revanseaza catre stapani din banul public desigur. Cate mojicie poate sa incapa intr-un impostor care  isi vinde neamul pentru binele lui personal si a famigliei.

http://bn24.ro/primarul-emil-boc-sponsor-pentru-promovarea-unui-terorist-si-a-unui-fascist/

http://www.stiripesurse.ro/dictatorul-fascist-miklos-horthy-comemorat-la-cluj-napoca-pe-bani-publici_964383.html

http://ziuadecj.realitatea.net/administratie/cum-a-ajuns-paszkany-din-mare-investitor-in-cartierul-tineretului-la-un-procent-de-0005-ce-risca-clujul-in-urma-asocierii-cu-omul-de-afaceri–136757.html

https://deveghepatriei.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/emil-boc-a-vandut-tot-centrul-clujului-catre-unguri-si-evrei/